Cerrar

No. de sistema: 000059294

LDR _ _ 00000nab^^22^^^^^za^4500
008 _ _ 190109m20189999xx^^r^p^o^^^^z0^^^a0eng^d
040 _ _ a| ECO
c| ECO
043 _ _ a| n-mx---
044 _ _ a| xx
245 0 3 a| Is applied nucleation a straightforward, cost-effective forest restoration approach? Counter-response to Holl and Zahawi (2018)
506 _ _ a| Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso
520 1 _ a| Holl and Zahawi (2018) agree on a number of approaches that we describe in a local case study of tropical montane cloud forest restoration in Mexico. However, they contend our argument that most applied nucleation projects have taken place in tropical lowlands as a mistake. They also provide data on the per‐hectare cost of restoration projects in Costa Rica and compare it to a higher cost figure of plantation‐style reforestation, a view contrary to ours. Last, Holl and Zahawi recognize that applied nucleation requires specialized personnel, but imply that the amount of training needed for this endeavor is not very different than what is required to implement other forest recovery projects. In this counter‐response, we provide some refinements to our original opinion and offer further information in support to our perspective.
530 _ _ a| Disponible en línea
533 _ _ a| Reproducción electrónica en formato PDF
538 _ _ a| Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior
650 _ 4 a| Restauración forestal
650 _ 4 a| Costo de reforestación
650 _ 4 a| Ciencias agropecuarias y biotecnología
651 _ 4 a| México
700 1 _ a| Ramírez Soto, Aníbal
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Lucio Palacio, César Raziel
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Rodríguez Mesa, Rafael
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Sheseña Hernández, Ixchel Minerva
e| autora
700 1 _ a| Farhat, Fadi N.
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Villa Bonilla, Bernardino
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Landa Libreros, Laura
e| autora
700 1 _ a| Gutiérrez Sosa, Gabriela
e| autora
700 1 _ a| Trujillo Santos, Omar
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Gómez Sánchez, Israel
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Ruelas Inzunza, Ernesto
e| autor
773 0 _
t| Restoration Ecology
g| Vol. 26, No. 4 (July 2018), p. 620–621
x| 1526-100X
900 _ _ a| Solicítelo con su bibliotecario/a
901 _ _ a| Artículo con arbitraje
902 _ _ a| BG / MM
904 _ _ a| enero 2019
905 _ _ a| Artecosur
905 _ _ a| Servibosques
905 _ _ a| Biblioelectrónica
LNG eng
Cerrar
*Solicítelo con su bibliotecario/a
Is applied nucleation a straightforward, cost-effective forest restoration approach? Counter-response to Holl and Zahawi (2018)
Ramírez Soto, Aníbal (autor)
Lucio Palacio, César Raziel (autor)
Rodríguez Mesa, Rafael (autor)
Sheseña Hernández, Ixchel Minerva (autora)
Farhat, Fadi N. (autor)
Villa Bonilla, Bernardino (autor)
Landa Libreros, Laura (autora)
Gutiérrez Sosa, Gabriela (autora)
Trujillo Santos, Omar (autor)
Gómez Sánchez, Israel (autor)
Ruelas Inzunza, Ernesto (autor)
Nota: Disponible en línea
Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso
Contenido en: Restoration Ecology. Vol. 26, No. 4 (July 2018), p. 620–621. ISSN: 1526-100X
No. de sistema: 59294
Tipo: - Artículo con arbitraje
PDF
  • Consulta (1)




Inglés

"Holl and Zahawi (2018) agree on a number of approaches that we describe in a local case study of tropical montane cloud forest restoration in Mexico. However, they contend our argument that most applied nucleation projects have taken place in tropical lowlands as a mistake. They also provide data on the per‐hectare cost of restoration projects in Costa Rica and compare it to a higher cost figure of plantation‐style reforestation, a view contrary to ours. Last, Holl and Zahawi recognize that applied nucleation requires specialized personnel, but imply that the amount of training needed for this endeavor is not very different than what is required to implement other forest recovery projects. In this counter‐response, we provide some refinements to our original opinion and offer further information in support to our perspective."


  • Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior