Cerrar

No. de sistema: 000059978

LDR _ _ 00000nab^^22^^^^^za^4500
008 _ _ 200305m20199999xx^^r^p^o^^^^z0^^^a0eng^d
040 _ _ a| ECO
c| ECO
043 _ _ a| n-mx---
044 _ _ a| xx
245 0 0 a| Agroecology and restoration ecology
b| fertile ground for Mexican peasant territoriality
506 _ _ a| Acceso en línea sin restricciones
520 1 _ a| Agroecological transformation must often take place in degraded landscapes. Thus, ecological restoration and related fields may extend agroecology’s reach. At the same time, agroecological practice may enhance ecological functions, contributing to ecosystem recovery in rural landscapes. The long-term impact of these initiatives will depend upon how they mesh with peasant territoriality; the relationship between land and people in its socioeconomic, political-institutional and symbolic-cultural dimensions. We analyzed agroecological and restoration/recuperation initiatives originating from government and non-governmental organizations with direct government support, and from peasant protagonism. We examined official records of initiatives in both categories, conducted in-depth interviews with public officials, and surveyed 47 small peasants associated with organic and agroecological markets. Government and government-linked NGO initiatives operate according to a neoliberal vision of sustainable-development that privileges generation of financial capital, also they have decreased their support for agroecology, and have little or no engagement with restoration/recuperation in terms of ecological or social complexity. By contrast, we identify a strong tendency in peasant agroecology that incorporates restoration/recuperation to achieve greater ecological and cultural complexity. The synergies that arise between agroecology and ecological recovery contribute to the construction of peasant territoriality, and are particularly evident in initiatives driven by indigenous organizations.
533 _ _ a| Reproducción electrónica en formato PDF
538 _ _ a| Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior
650 _ 4 a| Restauración ecológica
650 _ 4 a| Agroecología
650 _ 4 a| Degradación ambiental
650 _ 4 a| Organizaciones indígenas
650 _ 4 a| Neoliberalismo
650 _ 4 a| Desarrollo sostenible
650 _ 4 a| Programas gubernamentales
651 _ 4 a| México
700 1 _ a| Guzmán Luna, Alejandra
e| autora
700 1 _ a| Ferguson, Bruce G.
c| Dr.
d| 1967-
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Giraldo, Omar
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Schmook, Birgit Inge
c| Dra.
e| autora
700 1 _ a| Aldasoro Maya, Elda Miriam
e| autora
773 0 _
t| Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems
g| Vol. 43, no. 10 (2019), p. 1174–1200
x| 2168-3573
856 4 1 u| https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21683565.2019.1624284
z| Artículo electrónico
902 _ _ a| BG / MM
904 _ _ a| Marzo 2020
905 _ _ a| Artecosur
905 _ _ a| Biblioelectrónica
LNG eng
Cerrar
Agroecology and restoration ecology: fertile ground for Mexican peasant territoriality
Guzmán Luna, Alejandra (autora)
Ferguson, Bruce G., 1967- (autor)
Giraldo, Omar (autor)
Schmook, Birgit Inge (autora)
Aldasoro Maya, Elda Miriam (autora)
Nota: Acceso en línea sin restricciones
Contenido en: Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems. Vol. 43, no. 10 (2019), p. 1174–1200. ISSN: 2168-3573
No. de sistema: 59978
Tipo: Artículo
PDF


Inglés

"Agroecological transformation must often take place in degraded landscapes. Thus, ecological restoration and related fields may extend agroecology’s reach. At the same time, agroecological practice may enhance ecological functions, contributing to ecosystem recovery in rural landscapes. The long-term impact of these initiatives will depend upon how they mesh with peasant territoriality; the relationship between land and people in its socioeconomic, political-institutional and symbolic-cultural dimensions. We analyzed agroecological and restoration/recuperation initiatives originating from government and non-governmental organizations with direct government support, and from peasant protagonism. We examined official records of initiatives in both categories, conducted in-depth interviews with public officials, and surveyed 47 small peasants associated with organic and agroecological markets. Government and government-linked NGO initiatives operate according to a neoliberal vision of sustainable-development that privileges generation of financial capital, also they have decreased their support for agroecology, and have little or no engagement with restoration/recuperation in terms of ecological or social complexity. By contrast, we identify a strong tendency in peasant agroecology that incorporates restoration/recuperation to achieve greater ecological and cultural complexity. The synergies that arise between agroecology and ecological recovery contribute to the construction of peasant territoriality, and are particularly evident in initiatives driven by indigenous organizations."


  • Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior