Cerrar

No. de sistema: 000060497

LDR _ _ 00000nab^^22^^^^^za^4500
008 _ _ 200629m20209999xx^^r^p^o^^^^z0^^^a0eng^d
040 _ _ a| ECO
c| ECO
044 _ _ a| xx
245 0 4 a| The montane multifunctional landscape
b| how stakeholders in a biosphere reserve derive benefits and address trade-offs in ecosystem service supply
506 _ _ a| Acceso en línea sin restricciones
520 1 _ a| Ecosystem service (ES) assessments, which make an explicit link between nature and people’s well-being, can support the management of natural protected areas that face complex and persistent sustainability challenges. We present a case study of ES supply in a biosphere reserve community in southern Mexico. We aimed to identify stakeholder-relevant ES and to analyse trade-offs between them. After engaging local stakeholders, we conducted a biophysical assessment of ES supply and associations across four different land uses. Closed forests and riparian areas, which occurred in different parts of the landscape, supplied high levels of multiple ES. Furthermore, co-produced farming goods and services that supported local livelihoods and conservation-oriented ecosystem services coincided in these four habitats. Together, these habitats provided a diverse array of ES across the landscape, indicating that stakeholders benefited from a multifunctional landscape. At the same time significant trade-offs were found in the supply of forage cover against most other ES, especially tree-based goods and services. These trade-offs revealed conflicts between agricultural land and neighbouring open forests and riparian areas, as well as opposed service demands among beneficiary groups. To address these trade-offs, stakeholders agreed on enhancing forest benefits in order to support both local livelihoods and conservation goals.
530 _ _ a| Disponible en línea
533 _ _ a| Reproducción electrónica en formato PDF
538 _ _ a| Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior
700 1 _ a| Heinze, Alan
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Bongers, Frans
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Ramírez Marcial, Neptalí
d| 1963-
e| autor
700 1 _ a| García Barrios, Luis Enrique
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Kuyper, Thomas W.
e| autor
773 0 _
t| Ecosystem Services
g| Volumen 44, artículo 101134 (2020), p. 1-10
x| 2212-0416
856 4 1 u| https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041620300760
z| Artículo electrónico
902 _ _ a| BG
904 _ _ a| Junio 2020
905 _ _ a| Artecosur
905 _ _ a| Biblioelectrónica
LNG eng
Cerrar
The montane multifunctional landscape: how stakeholders in a biosphere reserve derive benefits and address trade-offs in ecosystem service supply
Heinze, Alan (autor)
Bongers, Frans (autor)
Ramírez Marcial, Neptalí, 1963- (autor)
García Barrios, Luis Enrique (autor)
Kuyper, Thomas W. (autor)
Nota: Disponible en línea
Acceso en línea sin restricciones
Contenido en: Ecosystem Services. Volumen 44, artículo 101134 (2020), p. 1-10. ISSN: 2212-0416
No. de sistema: 60497
Tipo: Artículo
PDF
  • Consulta (1)




Inglés

"Ecosystem service (ES) assessments, which make an explicit link between nature and people’s well-being, can support the management of natural protected areas that face complex and persistent sustainability challenges. We present a case study of ES supply in a biosphere reserve community in southern Mexico. We aimed to identify stakeholder-relevant ES and to analyse trade-offs between them. After engaging local stakeholders, we conducted a biophysical assessment of ES supply and associations across four different land uses. Closed forests and riparian areas, which occurred in different parts of the landscape, supplied high levels of multiple ES. Furthermore, co-produced farming goods and services that supported local livelihoods and conservation-oriented ecosystem services coincided in these four habitats. Together, these habitats provided a diverse array of ES across the landscape, indicating that stakeholders benefited from a multifunctional landscape. At the same time significant trade-offs were found in the supply of forage cover against most other ES, especially tree-based goods and services. These trade-offs revealed conflicts between agricultural land and neighbouring open forests and riparian areas, as well as opposed service demands among beneficiary groups. To address these trade-offs, stakeholders agreed on enhancing forest benefits in order to support both local livelihoods and conservation goals."


  • Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior