Vista normal Vista MARC

Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes: effects of geographic and taxonomic biases

De Palma, Adriana | Abrahamczyk, Stefan [autor/a] | Aizen, Marcelo A [autor/a] | Albrecht, Matthias [autor/a] | Basset, Yves [autor/a] | Bates, Adam [autor/a] | Blake, Robin J [autor/a] | Boutin, Céline [autor/a] | Bugter, Rob [autor/a] | Connop, Stuart [autor/a] | Cruz López, Leopoldo Caridad [autor/a] | Cunningham, Saul A [autor/a] | Darvill, Ben [autor/a] | Diekötter, Tim [autor/a] | Dorn, Silvia [autor/a].
Tipo de material: Artículo
 en línea Artículo en línea Tema(s): Abejas | Cambio de uso de la tierra | Actividades antropogénicas | Impacto ambiental | Taxonomía animal | BiogeografíaTema(s) en inglés: Bees | Land use change | Anthropogenic activities | Environmental impact | Animal taxonomy | BiogeographyNota de acceso: Acceso en línea sin restricciones En: Scientific Reports. volumen 6, número 31153 (August 2016), páginas 1-14. --ISSN: 2045-2322Número de sistema: 13969Resumen:
Inglés

Land-use change and intensification threaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services. Global models are needed to better characterise, project, and mitigate bees' responses to these human impacts. The available data are, however, geographically and taxonomically unrepresentative; most data are from North America and Western Europe, overrepresenting bumblebees and raising concerns that model results may not be generalizable to other regions and taxa. To assess whether the geographic and taxonomic biases of data could undermine effectiveness of models for conservation policy, we have collated from the published literature a global dataset of bee diversity at sites facing land-use change and intensification, and assess whether bee responses to these pressures vary across 11 regions (Western, Northern, Eastern and Southern Europe; North, Central and South America; Australia and New Zealand; South East Asia; Middle and Southern Africa) and between bumblebees and other bees. Our analyses highlight strong regionally-based responses of total abundance, species richness and Simpson's diversity to land use, caused by variation in the sensitivity of species and potentially in the nature of threats. These results suggest that global extrapolation of models based on geographically and taxonomically restricted data may underestimate the true uncertainty, increasing the risk of ecological surprises.

Recurso en línea: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep31153
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE)
ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400139696936

Acceso en línea sin restricciones

Land-use change and intensification threaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services. Global models are needed to better characterise, project, and mitigate bees' responses to these human impacts. The available data are, however, geographically and taxonomically unrepresentative; most data are from North America and Western Europe, overrepresenting bumblebees and raising concerns that model results may not be generalizable to other regions and taxa. To assess whether the geographic and taxonomic biases of data could undermine effectiveness of models for conservation policy, we have collated from the published literature a global dataset of bee diversity at sites facing land-use change and intensification, and assess whether bee responses to these pressures vary across 11 regions (Western, Northern, Eastern and Southern Europe; North, Central and South America; Australia and New Zealand; South East Asia; Middle and Southern Africa) and between bumblebees and other bees. Our analyses highlight strong regionally-based responses of total abundance, species richness and Simpson's diversity to land use, caused by variation in the sensitivity of species and potentially in the nature of threats. These results suggest that global extrapolation of models based on geographically and taxonomically restricted data may underestimate the true uncertainty, increasing the risk of ecological surprises. eng

Disponible en línea

Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior

Con tecnología Koha