Vista normal Vista MARC

An economic analysis of the potential for carbon sequestration by forests: evidence from southern Mexico

Por: De Jong, Bernardus Hendricus Jozeph. Doctor [autor/a].
Tipper, Richard [autor/a] | Montoya Gómez, Guillermo [autor/a].
Tipo de material: Artículo impreso(a) y electrónico Artículo impreso(a) y electrónico Tema(s): Captura de carbono | Ordenación forestal | Análisis económicoDescriptor(es) geográficos: Región Altos (Chiapas, México) Clasificación: AR/363.738747 / D4 Nota de acceso: Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de accesoDisponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso En: Ecological Economics. volumen 33, número 2 (May 2000), 313-327. --ISSN: 0921-8009Número de sistema: 23236Resumen:
Inglés

Forestry has been proposed as a means to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions, by either reducing sources or enhancing sinks. This study assesses the potential of an incentive-based program to stimulate small farmers and communities to adopt biomass accumulating measures such as agroforestry or improved forest management. Current vegetation type, land use and stocks of carbon were assessed for an area of around 600 000 ha in southern Mexico, and the carbon (C) sequestration potential of a number of alternative techniques, based on farmers' preferences, was estimated. Cost and benefit flows in US $ per Megagram (=106 g) of carbon (MgC) of each current and alternative system were developed. A model was designed to calculate the expected response to financial incentives of between US $0 and $40 per MgC sequestered. The most cost-effective method for sequestering carbon appears to be the improved management of natural forest on communal lands. We estimated that 38×106 MgC could be sequestered for under US $15 MgC−1, of which 32×106 MgC through forest management. The choice of a baseline rate of biomass loss under a 'business-as-usual' scenario remains a critical issue for estimates of the cost-effectiveness of carbon sequestration by forestry.

Recurso en línea: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800999001627
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Info Vol Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Artículos Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE) 		ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400232365211
Artículos Biblioteca San Cristóbal

Texto en la configuración de la biblioteca San Cristóbal

Artículos (AR) 		ECOSUR AR 363.738747 D4 001 Disponible ECO010012874
Artículos Biblioteca San Cristóbal

Texto en la configuración de la biblioteca San Cristóbal

Artículos (AR) 		ECOSUR AR 363.738747 D4/EJ. 2 003 Disponible ECO010019107
Artículos Biblioteca Villahermosa

Texto en la configuración de la biblioteca Villahermosa

Artículos (AR) 		ECOSUR AR 363.738747 D4 002 Disponible ECO050002088

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso

Forestry has been proposed as a means to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions, by either reducing sources or enhancing sinks. This study assesses the potential of an incentive-based program to stimulate small farmers and communities to adopt biomass accumulating measures such as agroforestry or improved forest management. Current vegetation type, land use and stocks of carbon were assessed for an area of around 600 000 ha in southern Mexico, and the carbon (C) sequestration potential of a number of alternative techniques, based on farmers' preferences, was estimated. Cost and benefit flows in US $ per Megagram (=106 g) of carbon (MgC) of each current and alternative system were developed. A model was designed to calculate the expected response to financial incentives of between US $0 and $40 per MgC sequestered. The most cost-effective method for sequestering carbon appears to be the improved management of natural forest on communal lands. We estimated that 38×106 MgC could be sequestered for under US $15 MgC−1, of which 32×106 MgC through forest management. The choice of a baseline rate of biomass loss under a 'business-as-usual' scenario remains a critical issue for estimates of the cost-effectiveness of carbon sequestration by forestry. eng

Disponible en línea

Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior

Con tecnología Koha