Cerrar

No. de sistema: 000041543

LDR _ _ 00000nab^^22^^^^^za^4500
008 _ _ 200706m20209999xx^^r^p^o^^^^z0^^^a0eng^d
040 _ _ a| ECO
c| ECO
044 _ _ a| xx
245 0 2 a| A 2D image-based approach for CFD validation of liquid mixing in a free-surface condition
506 _ _ a| Acceso en línea sin restricciones
520 1 _ a| This study proposes an image-based approach to evaluate the validity of numerical results for cases where the setup can be assumed to be two-dimensional (2D) and mixing between liquids of different densities occurs under a free-surface condition. The proposed methodology is based on the estimation of the relative errors of the model through density matrices generated from images of the experimental and numerical results (i.e., post-processing snapshots of the density field). To demonstrate the use of the methodology, experimental tests and numerical simulations were performed for a double-dam-break problem with two miscible liquids. For the experiments, a high-speed camera was employed to capture details of the fluid interactions after the dam breaking. For the numerical simulations, an OpenFOAM® multiphase solver was employed to reproduce the benchmarking tests. Three turbulence approaches were tested: a zero-equation RANS model, a two-equation (k-epsilon) RANS model, and a Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) model. The experimental results compared favorably against the numerical results, with average drelative errors of ~17 and ~19% for the zero-equation and the two-equation turbulence models, respectively, and ~14% for the LES model. From the results obtained, it can be inferred that the two-equation (k-epsilon) model had limitations in reproducing the mixing between the liquid phases in terms of relative errors. The LES model reproduces the mixing between phases more accurately than zero and two-equation RANS models, which were seen to be more suitable for capturing the formation of large eddies in the initial phase of the experiment. The present methodology canbe improved and extended for different multiphase flow configurations.
530 _ _ a| Disponible en línea
533 _ _ a| Reproducción electrónica en formato PDF
538 _ _ a| Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior
700 1 _ a| Rodríguez Ocampo, P. E.
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Ring, M.
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Hernández Fontes, J. V.
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Alcérreca Huerta, Juan Carlos
c| Doctor
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Mendoza Ramírez, Eduardo
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Gallegos Diez Barroso, Gabriel
e| autor
700 1 _ a| Silva, R.
e| autor
773 0 _
t| Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics
g| Volume 13, número 5 (2020), p. 1487-1500
x| 1735-3645
856 4 1 u| http://jafmonline.net/web/guest/home
z| Artículo electrónico
902 _ _ a| BG
904 _ _ a| Julio 2020
905 _ _ a| Artecosur
905 _ _ a| Biblioelectrónica
LNG eng
Cerrar
A 2D image-based approach for CFD validation of liquid mixing in a free-surface condition
Rodríguez Ocampo, P. E. (autor)
Ring, M. (autor)
Hernández Fontes, J. V. (autor)
Alcérreca Huerta, Juan Carlos (autor)
Mendoza Ramírez, Eduardo (autor)
Gallegos Diez Barroso, Gabriel (autor)
Silva, R. (autor)
Nota: Disponible en línea
Acceso en línea sin restricciones
Contenido en: Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics. Volume 13, número 5 (2020), p. 1487-1500. ISSN: 1735-3645
No. de sistema: 41543
Tipo: Artículo
PDF
  • Consulta (1)




Inglés

"This study proposes an image-based approach to evaluate the validity of numerical results for cases where the setup can be assumed to be two-dimensional (2D) and mixing between liquids of different densities occurs under a free-surface condition. The proposed methodology is based on the estimation of the relative errors of the model through density matrices generated from images of the experimental and numerical results (i.e., post-processing snapshots of the density field). To demonstrate the use of the methodology, experimental tests and numerical simulations were performed for a double-dam-break problem with two miscible liquids. For the experiments, a high-speed camera was employed to capture details of the fluid interactions after the dam breaking. For the numerical simulations, an OpenFOAM® multiphase solver was employed to reproduce the benchmarking tests. Three turbulence approaches were tested: a zero-equation RANS model, a two-equation (k-epsilon) RANS model, and a Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) model. The experimental results compared favorably against the numerical results, with average drelative errors of ~17 and ~19% for the zero-equation and the two-equation turbulence models, respectively, and ~14% for the LES model. From the results obtained, it can be inferred that the two-equation (k-epsilon) model had limitations in reproducing the mixing between the liquid phases in terms of relative errors. The LES model reproduces the mixing between phases more accurately than zero and two-equation RANS models, which were seen to be more suitable for capturing the formation of large eddies in the initial phase of the experiment. The present methodology canbe improved and extended for different multiphase flow configurations."


  • Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superior