Vista normal Vista MARC

Some methodological approaches to estimate and monitor carbon mitigation in the forestry sector

Por: De Jong, Bernardus Hendricus Jozeph. Doctor [autor].
Tipo de material: Capítulo de libro en línea Capítulo de libro en línea Tipo de contenido: Texto Tipo de medio: Computadora Tipo de portador: Recurso en líneaTema(s): Proyecto Scolel´ té (México) | Captura de carbono | Uso de la tierra | Gases de efecto invernadero | Economía forestal | AgroforesteríaTema(s) en inglés: Carbon sequestration | Land use | Greenhouse gases | Forest economics | AgroforestryDescriptor(es) geográficos: Región Altos (Chiapas, México) Nota de acceso: Acceso en línea sin restricciones En: North American science symposium : toward a unified framework for inventorying and monitoring forest ecosystem resourcess. Guadalajara, Mexico (November 2-6, 1998) / Celedonio Aguirre Bravo, Carlos Rodríguez Franco, compilador. Fort Collins, Colorado, United States : Proceedings RMRS-P-12. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 1999. páginas 130-138Número de sistema: 54019Resumen:
Español

Forestry and agroforestry are promlsmg land-use alternatives for reducing the increasing levels of global atmospheric carbon. To understand the role of forestry and agroforestry systems in the carbon cycle it is necessary to quantify both the net annual carbon fluxes and the total carbon content of the systems. The effect of a forestry project has to be compared with a "business as usual" baseline. There exist various methodological approaches to estimate the impact on carbon fluxes of forestry and agroforestry. Known problems of baseline assumptions, carbon flux reporting, and monitoring and verification are exemplified with field collected data and recent experiences of the Scolel Te Pilot Project for Community Forestry and Carbon Sequestration in Chiapas, Mexico (Scolel Te 1998). The "Greenhouse Gas Bubble (GGB)" concept as an alternative instrument for carbon offset trading and reporting is discussed

Recurso en línea: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_p012/rmrs_p012_130_138.pdf | https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/33424
Etiquetas de esta biblioteca: No hay etiquetas de esta biblioteca para este título. Ingresar para agregar etiquetas.
Star ratings
    Valoración media: 0.0 (0 votos)
Existencias
Tipo de ítem Biblioteca actual Colección Signatura Estado Fecha de vencimiento Código de barras
Capítulos de libro Biblioteca Electrónica
Recursos en línea (RE) 		ECOSUR Recurso digital ECO400540199894

Acceso en línea sin restricciones

Forestry and agroforestry are promlsmg land-use alternatives for reducing the increasing levels of global atmospheric carbon. To understand the role of forestry and agroforestry systems in the carbon cycle it is necessary to quantify both the net annual carbon fluxes and the total carbon content of the systems. The effect of a forestry project has to be compared with a "business as usual" baseline. There exist various methodological approaches to estimate the impact on carbon fluxes of forestry and agroforestry. Known problems of baseline assumptions, carbon flux reporting, and monitoring and verification are exemplified with field collected data and recent experiences of the Scolel Te Pilot Project for Community Forestry and Carbon Sequestration in Chiapas, Mexico (Scolel Te 1998). The "Greenhouse Gas Bubble (GGB)" concept as an alternative instrument for carbon offset trading and reporting is discussed spa

Haga clic en una imagen para verla en el visor de imágenes

Con tecnología Koha